【楊朝一包養網站明】《禮運》“年夜同”說的實質與意義

Confucianism for a long time spent in teaching and social life, leaving behind a large number of precious comments. The relevant information is particularly Confucius said that no one would doubt Confucius’ familiarity with the ceremony of the Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties, nor would he doubt Confucius’ admiration for the “Ming Kings” of the three generations. The “Travel” chapter retained in “Confucius’s Family” and “Travels” is a concentrated manifestation of Confucius’ social fantasy, and systematically displays Confucius’ thoughts on gifts. “Travels” is a major article in the history of Confucianism and even Chinese thinking civilization. For a long time, people have conducted a lot of discussions on “Tree” and its “same” thinking. However, due to the influence of the “Sad Book” of “Confucius Family”, people rarely noticed the “Tree” chapter in “Confucius Family”, and rarely noticed the difference between this chapter and “Tree Book” and its literary meaning. However, even though people are important to use “Tree” in “Tree” as the study text, some scholars still see the close relationship between “Tree” and Confucius, and understand the characteristics of the pre-Qin era that this article contemplates., I believe that although the “Tribute” was later written in the era, the thinking about the way of “big synonyms” was pre-Qin. There are still many misunderstandings in people’s understanding, and the main value of this article is clearly concealed. This article discusses the “big” statement in “Travel” based on previous research. In the breeze, I hope to get criticism and correctness!

1. The “big” thinking in the “Tree” is attributed to Confucius

For a long time, due to the severe influence of doubts about the ancient thought, people have doubted the “Tree of Confucius” and said it was a strange report on the issue of “Tree of the Book”, which seriously affected the understanding of the value of “Tree of the Book”. At this day, there are still baoqiang.net students question the authenticity of “Travel”, and there are some errors in their understanding and understanding of this article. For example, although Master Jin Chunfeng believes that “Tender” is a major article in Confucianism and the history of Chinese civilization thinking, he believes that “Tender” is edited and compiled by Han Confucianism. Some of the contents are written by Han people, reflecting the great gift views of Han people, heaven and man [1]. What exactly is this problem? It needs to be carefully studied, otherwise there will be “error and confusion in thinking history”.

If there is an error in the literary and writing problems, if the Han Dynasty thoughts as Confucius’s words and the disciples’ discussions, they will “turn Confucius’ thoughts into Han people and Dong Zhongshu.” On the contrary, if such thinking belongs to Confucius and his life, the ancients thought it belonged to Han people, but such errors were equally serious, it would bring Confucius’ thinking to Han Dynasty, which actually underestimated Confucius’ thinking and underestimated the development of late Confucianism. It is easy to see that the text clearly recorded in “Travel” as “written by Confucius”, which is equivalent to saying that “the Han Dynasty scholars pretend to be Confucius’ name”, which is completely similar to the concept of “Han people’s words” that was called during the period of doubting the ancient thought trend. Of course, the errors and confusion here are still not difficult to see clearly.

Ten years ago, the writer paid attention to “Greetings” and thought about its chapter and its school nature, and found that people were very confused about the issues related to this chapter. For example, many basic problems, such as when did “Travel” become? Can the thoughts in this belong to Confucianism, or what is the nature of the school? There are serious disagreements, and it can even be said to be a group, which represents the serious distortion of the influence of ancient thoughts and the following academic knowledge. The understanding of this major article, regarding the description of the faces of the late Chinese thinking history, cannot be as good as not to be honest in the analysis. Through the discussion of the complete questions of “Talents” and the differences between “Talents” in “Talents” and “Talents” in “Talents”, we clearly see that Han edited “Talents”, many of which have indeed been written and edited from the beginning, but Han Confucians did not lack awe of Confucius as the ancients believed. They were very capable.Without any movement, we use “Confucius” to express our own initiative. Perhaps, “Travel” is not “out of Han people’s mischief”. Through the analysis of the key issues in this, we should be able to explain the genre of “Greetings” and dispel people’s doubts.

The biggest problem in “Greetings” is the author of this article. How “Talent” is written is related to many problems in the text, such as “Confucius’s Family” and “Talents” have “Talents”. If we abandon “Family” and use the text of “Talents” based on traditional views, then the conclusions will be more miserable. In fact, we have compared the two texts of “Family” and “Talks”. Compared with the similarities and similarities between the two, we clearly found that the text of “Talks” is not as good as “Family”. We comprehensively review the differences between the texts in the content of the two, and strongly feel that many of the adaptations of “Talks” are reflected.

For example, the first part of the “Tree” chapter, the “Tree” chapter of “Confucius’s Family Words” is written: “Confucius was a Lusigu, and he was with the slaughter. After he was paid for the work, he went out to visit the temple and sighed. He said, “Why is the Master?” Confucius said: “I have not done anything in the past with the heroes of the three generations. When he was caught, he had a record. ’” The chapter in “The Book of Songs” reads: “In the past, Confucius and I went out to travel to the view, but I sighed. Confucius’s slap was a slap. He was on the side and said, ‘Why are you a slap?’ Confucius said, ‘The way of the big way is to be with the heroes of the three generations, and he has ambition.’” href=”https://twsugarlover.org/”>Baocai Network VIP is not difficult to see that compared with “Travels”, “Confucius’s Family” is more like the times, giving people a clear sense of appearance. “The Master’s Sword” in “Confucius’s Family” is written in “The Book of Songs” and “The Book of Songs” is written in “The Book of Songs”. It is obvious that the “Confucius’s Family” is correct, because Confucius’s life and even the officials and officials at that time often called Confucius the “Master”. Our reviews based on previous comparisons are not difficult to judge. Compared with “Confucius’s Family”, “Travels” have a great change in data, while “Confucius’s Family” focuses more on maintaining the original appearance of the book.

The sp